Another day another found footage horror movie-oh joy! Actually some of the ones I’ve seen recently haven’t been that bad. But my luck must be running out soon, right?
Directed by Ti West The Sacrament follows Patrick (Kentucker Audley), a fashion photographer for VICE Magazine who receives a letter from his sister Caroline inviting him to her commune called Eden Parish which can only be reached by helicopter as it’s in a remote location. Intrigued by the letter his co-workers, Sam (A.J Bowen), a reporter and Jake (Joe Swanberg), a cameraman decide to accompany Patrick and make a documentary about Eden Parish. While at first the community seem idyllic they soon find out that a dark heart lies in Eden Parish.
One day there will be a movie about a mysterious commune and the big twist will be they are not some evil cult! As predictable as it is that something is seriously wrong with Eden Parrish (made even more clear as the film borrows heavily from real life events of Jonestown in 1978) The Sacrament is a tense and well made movie. It may be a bit slow for some horror buffs at first, but it does help build up the atmosphere as the cynical journalists are lured into a false sense of security before almost immediately having their suspicions raised again.
What is also refreshing is that a lot of the action takes place during the day which makes the events unfolding on-screen more terrifying. The sun shines as the deaths pile up and Eden Parish’s future becomes bleaker and bleaker. The actors are good (horror fans may remember actors Bowen and Swansberg as members of the unlucky Davison clan in You’re Next, in which director West also made a small appearance) and they are confidently directed by West.The commune’s leader, an older Southern man who everyone creepily calls Father (chillingly played by Gene Jones), is also a good villian and is exactly how I imagine these cult leaders to really be like.
It may lack depth or any real comment about these types of cults and the people who join them but fans of horror may find this of interest.
Rating 3/5 – disturbing and uneasy, but probably only of interest to horror fans
The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel was the surprise hit of 2012, now it’s sequel-the imaginatively titled The Second Best Exotic Marigold Hotel has been released. Can it repeat the same success again?
With the hotel flourishing under the management of Muriel (Maggie Smith) and Sonny (Dev Patel), they are looking to expand and buy a second hotel. But their future depends on an anonymous company inspector who will evaluate their prospects. Meanwhile the regular guests at the hotel continue with their new lives and loves in India while everything culminates at Sonny and Sunaina’s (Tina Desai) wedding.
It would be easy to make a joke saying that this is the second best film of the two movies, and it is. But it also knows its audience and gives them what they want. I thoroughly enjoyed the first movie, and the sequel doesn’t deviate too much from the winning formula. The majority of the cast are back, with a few new additions, and everything feels comfortable, homely and charming. A lot of it is down to its excellent cast who works their magic on the script and brings their characters to life. At times it can feel a bit predictable but that’s also reassuring in a way. The characters feel like old friends that you’re happy to see again; even the eternally annoying Jean (Penelope Wilton) makes a quick appearance. Although at least she’s meant to be grating.
It’s a film that’s not afraid to move at its own place, and by that I mean it’s rather slow at times. Which is fine, not everything needs to be car chases and explosions, but sometimes you do wish they could move the plot along a bit quicker. Even slower is the relationship between Evelyn (Judi Dench) and Douglas (Bill Nighy), who are still trying to decide if they are more than just friends. Although you want to tell them to hurry it long already there is something quite sweet and gentle about their relationship. Just like the film itself really.
Rating 3/5 – nothing groundbreaking but a reliable comedy-drama all the same
Having a deep discussion with my work colleagues the other day offered up a number of big, important debates. One in particular stood out in my mind. Which Game of Thrones character are you? The answer can be quite revealing.
I asked my colleagues who they thought I was. The answer was quite surprising-to me anyway. Apparently I’m like Sansa Stark.
Knowing that some people really disliked Sansa I was not sure if I was happy with that comparison, surely I’m a stronger character like Arya or Daenerys? And that would mean I would fall for idiots like Joffrey! Then when I thought about it Sansa was probably more accurate then I thought. While I’m not overly girlie like Sansa I’m nowhere near a Tomboy like Arya. I like luxury and the nice things in life. I am normally quite polite and don’t like conflict. I probably wouldn’t be aware of the political maneuvering behind the scenes like Sansa was at the beginning of the show – in other words a bit dim when it comes to those kind of things. I also wouldn’t be able to cope with the burning hot sun and sand where Daenerys currently reigns. I am no dragon.
So with that all in mind, let me know which Game of Thrones character are you? And which one do you wish you were?
Are you the keeper of secrets and gossips like Lord Varys? Do you know nothing like Jon Snow? Or are you the Queen of scheming like power-hungry Cersei Lannister? (hopefully without the incest). Let me know in the comments below.
Also for those of us who have not read the books-please no spoilers! Thanks.
First there was BBF and BFF, but apparently the coolest thing is the GBF-that’s Gay Best Friend to those not in the know. In G.B.F this American Teen comedy looks at the current trend of having a Gay Best Friend as the new fashion accessory but will it be sassy enough to make me enjoy this movie?
Tanner (Michael J. Willett) and his best friend Brent (Paul Iacono) are both closeted gay teenagers. Brent is desperate to come out but Tanner is not ready yet. When Tanner is accidently forced to come out he risks getting beaten up by the school jocks and bullies. His unlikely saviours come in the form of the three most popular girls at school (from rival cliques), who protect Tanner from the bullies as long as he chooses to become one of the girls’ GBF and promote their bid for Prom Queen.
If words like GBF, OMG or any kind of American Teen acronym bring you out in hives, you’re probably thinking you should avoid this at all cost. But G.B.F is actually a surprisingly sweet and likeable movie, albeit one that isn’t in the same league as films such as Mean Girls however much it tries. There isn’t as many snappy one liners or laugh out loud comedy to ensure that kind of status but I like the fact that the gay best friend normally seen in these movies is for once taking centre stage and given more to do then dispense fashion advise. The film lightly examines how Tanner is treated differently when he comes out. One of its main themes is about friendship and how the girls act like Tanner is a possession or a pet rather than a person.
Willett is cute and relatable as the shy Tanner who’s pushed into the limelight when he is thrown out of the closet. I’ve heard some say that Willett plays practically the same role as the one he does in TV series Faking It. But apart from both characters being gay they are actually very different. Whereas Willett’s Faking It character Shane is camp, confident and promiscuous, Tanner is shy, nerdy and more reserved, although grows in confidence as the film progresses.
Its young cast (mostly seen in TV shows like Awkward and Desperate Housewives) gamely bring their all to the comedy. While the film has all the usual teen movie clichés (popular girl, sassy black girl, camp gay friend etc) it tries to bring a little depth to them. For example Sasha Pieterse at first seems to be playing a similar character to Alison in Pretty Little Liars; however her role as Fawcett is given some much needed layers to the popular blond girl cliché.
While it’s not going to be a classic teen movie it’s still a thoroughly enjoyable one.
Rating 3/5 – a fun and endearing movie with a sweet centre
When will horror movie teens learn, just don’t have sex-ever! This latest horror from director/writer David Robert Mitchell makes a direct link between sex and death that is so often implied in slasher movies. But will this movie offer anything original to the horror genre?
Nineteen year old Jay (Maika Monroe) sleeps with her new boyfriend, who soon confesses afterwards that he has passed a deadly curse on to her through sex. A creature will be following her, slowly but steadily and won’t rest until she’s dead. No one else can see the creature and it can look like anyone. She can run for a while but the only sure-fire way to rid herself of the curse is to pass it on to someone else.
It Follows offers a new take on the sex equals death theme that runs through these type of movies. It’s a simple idea with a haunting creature that can take on any form while relentlessly coming for its victim. The beginning, showing one girl affected by the curse, is interesting and suspenseful as you wonder what the hell is going on. As you discover the rules of the curse you are willing Jay on to find a way to escape the creature’s clutches. You are constantly on edge as you are watching the screen, checking in the background for a lone figure to be coming straight for Jay. Monroe shows her role in The Guest was not a fluke and could be the new Scream Queen to watch. Her sister and friends are also a likeable and loyal bunch-which is makes a refreshing change for a horror film which normally show teenagers as bratty and horrible.
The film has a stylish look to it, almost dreamlike at the beginning until it turns into a waking nightmare (perhaps appropriate considering the idea for the film came to the director in his sleep). The director choreograph the film perfectly using 360 degree pans to make you feel like you always have to be on the lookout.The score also felt menacing and foreboding although was perhaps overplayed a little by the end.
Considering how creepy the premise is and how well made it is, it’s a becomes a little disappointing as it goes on. Bottom line is, it just wasn’t scary enough. After a great build up I kept expecting something a bit more but there was no final set piece that had me jumping out my seat or left me to scared to go to sleep. Maybe it was because I read so many good things about this film beforehand that it couldn’t live up to the hype?
Still for anyone looking for something different, this little chiller may provide some creepy fun.
Rating 3.5/5 – smart and creepy but needed to have more scares to be considered a classic
The world has gone crazy for 50 Shades of Grey. Whether you love it or hate it everyone seems to have an opinion on it. Now the craze is at fever pitch following the release of the movie version by director Sam Taylor-Johnson. But was it worth the wait to the big screen or just an anti-climax?
When college graduate Anastasia Steele (Dakota Johnson) interviews the handsome, wealthy, businessman Christian Grey (Jamie Dornan) there is an immediate attraction. However Christian is not one for a conventional relationship and prefers to be in a dominant/submissive relationship. Despite both their misgivings Ana and Christian cannot stay away from each other and have passionate sex together, but can they be together if Christian is so intent on not having a normal relationship?
I read the first 50 Shades book when it came out and while it was an easy enough read to pass the time I did not continue reading the trilogy due to the annoying characters and the bad writing of the novels. I was interested in how the book would be made into a film considering it’s just Twilight fan fiction with added sex (and less sparkly vampires). In my opinion Sam Taylor-Johnson has done the best she could with the source material. Yes she has cut down the sex scenes which has annoyed the author E.L James as well as some fans but that doesn’t really come as a surprise. If you’re hiring a serious and accomplished director like Taylor-Johnson she wasn’t going to made a porn movie, and besides the film was long enough as it is without any more sex scenes added to it.
Considering how much I hated both the characters in the book I was surprised at how much they didn’t bother me in the film. This is partly due to the script which wisely cuts out Ana’s inner monologues with any mention of her inner goddess completely vanished, and they’ve reduced the amount of times Christian calls Ana ‘baby’ which was endlessly creepy and unsexy even if it was meant ironically. His stalker tendencies are also played down which is a relief as this annoyed me no end in the book (stalking is not sexy people!). The casting has also been a big help. Dakota Johnson managed the impossible in making whiney, weak Ana into an actual likeable person. She’s the best thing in this movie and they were lucky to find her. Dornan looks good and plays a damaged character well but he was better as a serial killer in the BBC drama The Fall. The two actors have just enough chemistry to keep you watching the movie.
Still this was never going to be the most critically acclaimed movie of the year and 50 Shades has its issues. It isn’t the best plot in the world. It’s a bit boring in places, and the film feels repetitive. And Christian still seems creepy and obsessive even if he is played by the lovely Jamie Dornan. After it was over I couldn’t say I’m in any rush to see the next movie.
Rating 3/5 – it won’t please everyone, but an accomplished director and likeable cast prevents this movie from being a disaster