I swear since having Netflix I seem to spend more time watching bad movies than I ever used to. Even the Syfy channel gives me more amusing movies. Solstice is an American supernatural horror that’s a remake of Danish thriller Midsummer and was also directed by Daniel Myrick the director of The Blair Witch Project.
A few months after Megan’s twin sister Sophie (both played by Elisabeth Harnois) commits suicide she goes to a Lake House with her friends to celebrate the Solstice. But Megan soon starts to notice weird things happening. Is her sister trying to contact her from the dead?
Sometimes a film can be so boring you don’t have much to say about it. It isn’t bad enough to be entertaining in the Sharknado-type-mould-at least that film is intentionally bad which makes it kind of good. Whereas this horror movie doesn’t even have the decency to suck really badly. It just goes through various horror tropes without any originality and practically nothing happens for the entire movie and when it does you barely care anymore.
On a personal note being a twin I was really annoyed by how this movie (and lots of films in general) portrays twins. It is really irritating hearing how twins are one half of the same soul or whatever bullshit (although my family likes to joke that I only have half a brain). I like to think I have my own soul thank you very much. Also the main character whines about how much she misses her dead twin and then goes and sleeps with said dead twin’s ex-boyfriend! Ew! I would definitely haunt my twin if she did that to me.
Unless you have some enjoyment from watching mildly recognisable stars of teen tv and films I’d leave this film well alone.
Rating 1/5 -unless you’re looking for a cure for insomnia stay well clear
As the 2013 movie The Purge was such a disapoinment I was not particularly interested in any sequel that would inevitably follow. However when I saw the trailer for The Purge:Anarchy I was surprised at how good it looked. So much so that I was enticed back to the cinema to see it. But will this be a rare superior sequel?
On the 21 March 2033 on the 9th year of the annual Purge across America-where all crime is legal for 12 hours-5 strangers try to survive the streets of Los Angeles. But with potential killers around every corner can they make it through the night?
The first Purge movie was constricted by it’s one setting and focusing on one rich family’s plight. I understand that having a low budget put restrictions on the setting which is why the action was set in one house and a small cast. But I was more interested in the outside world and the widespread impact of the purge, especially for the poor who cannot afford the security or the weapons to defend themselves. Thankfully due to an increase in budget this movie shows us exactly how those on the poverty line are the most at risk. The purge is the sport of the rich and privledge, and while the poor also indulge in the purge, more often then not they are the victims of it.
The 5 strangers make for a sympathetic bunch. Leo (Frank Grillo-last seen pulling bad guy duties in Captian America:The Winter Soldier) is out for revenge when he meets Eva (Carmen Ejeho) her daughter Calli (Zoe Soul) and a married couple Shane (Zach Gilford) and Liz (Kiele Shanchez) desperately in need of help. Despite his better judgement he ends up helping them out. Leo is probably the nearest to a lead character and he’s great defending against anyone who tries to attack them. In fact he makes the other characters come off as a bit useless in comparison. But that also feels more realistic as these 4 people are examples of those who are naturally at a disadvantage during the time of trhe Purge and are at the mercy of people more sadastic and/or richer than they are.
There’s much more edge of your seat thrills than in the original, as the gang try to make it across Downtown, avoiding various groups trying to track them. You’re willing for them to survive the night even when things look bleak. Theres plenty of jumps and scares amid the social commentary, and also plenty more people in creepy masks like in the first film.
However there are flaws in this sequel. Sometimes the message “rich people are assholes” is too heavy handed. While the scenes on the street are exciting the sequences inside an elite hunting arena slows down the action and are not as scary as being hunted on the streets. Also theres no explaination as to why the married couple are driving around shortly before the purge is about to start. Shouldn’t they have made this journey earlier? Also why did they bother stopping for groceries on the way-you’re on a time constraint people-hurry the fuck up! A couple of times the teenage Callie can also be a bit whiney but she was not as bad as I expected.
Some viewers may also be put off by a film that preaches ‘violence is bad’ by…making a movie full of violence! While hard-core gore-loving horror fans may be put off by it’s 15 certificate (or whatever the equivilent rating is world-wide). Personally though I don’t think having a 15 certificate hindered the film. I prefer films that don’t over rely on gore (although I don’t mind a little here and there).
Rating 3.5/5 – nerve-wracking and creepy-a satisfying summer horror thats an improvement on the first film
Found Footage movies is not something I would associate with Barry Levinson, the Oscar winning director of Rain Man. Yet this 2012 film sees Levinson dipping his directing toes into the horror genre. Will the resulting film produce somehting new into this tired genre?
On the Fourth July 2009 the population of Chesapeake Bay are meant to be enjoying the festivties. However when the townsfolk start developing a blister like rash on their bodies they realise there may something in the water of the Bay.
For a found footage movie this at least tries to do something a bit different. Levinosn has given the film a touch of class and it certianly looks more impressive (and it probably had a bit more money) than than the average film of this genre. It also helps that there isn’t just one person running around capturing the action as it unfolds when they should put the camera down and get the hell out of there. We see various people’s videocameras, Podcasts, police car camera, Skype etc. It helps make this seem like a widespread problem affecting a whole town as we see snippets of mulitple storylines as it moves across the whole town. The acting is affective and not melodramatic as can sometimes be in horror movies. The special effects and makeup is also very good and appropriately disgusting and grusome as one would hope for.
Although the film does come up with reasons for people to be filming the events,as at some points it does stretch credibility. As one character asks another “Is it really necessary for you to keep filming?” you can’t help but feel like they are speaking the minds of the audience. Also the film is more about the build up of tension and dread with one or two shocking moments rather than a wtaching behind the pillow full blow terror. The ending feels rather abrupt as well, maybe needing a more clixmatic ending.
Rating 3.5/5 – If you’re looking for an Academy Award winning director’s take on the found footage genre then give this thrilling eco-disaster movei a try
Produced by Ron Howard and with a starry cast, I had high hopes for Inventing The Abbotts even though I hadn’t read much about it. Was I right to have such high expectations?
Brothers J.C (Billy Crudup) and Doug (Joaquin Phoenix) live with their single mother (Kathy Baker) in a small town in 1950s Illinois. their lives have been intertwined with that of the rich Abbott family and their daughters Alice (Joanna Going), Eleanor (Jennifer Connolly) and Pam (Liv Tyler). While J.C is grows increasingly obsessed with the Abbotts and what he believes to be injustice in his life, younger brother Doug is falling for Pam. But with so many complications between their families can they ever get together?
This film begins promisingly, a good cast, simmering tension beneath the surface and a good-looking film makes you hope for the best. However while the cast do their best to hold your attention they are weighed down by a plot that becomes increasingly tedious. J.C anger against the Abbotts is interesting to start with but his actions become repetitive and boring. I kept thinking “Just get over it already.” It also felt his issues could have been sorted out earlier if he had just an honest conversation with his mother over her history with the Abbotts.
Doug is a bit dull and his on again off again relationship with Pam becomes just as boring as J.C antics. Again you feel everyone would have been better off if they just communicated a bit better and stop being such jerks. The whole ‘rich father having a problem with his daughters’ poor boyfriend’ storyline is also unoriginal and lacks any proper drama. The Abbott sisters are also thinly drawn, basically just there as pawns and objects of desire for the leading men.
A disappointing and mediocre film overall.
Rating 2/5 – the cast may hold some appeal but ultimately this film is too dull to hold an audience’s attention
Adapting a young adult novel seems to be all the range at the moment. This movie from 2011 (but only recently released in the UK) The Moth Diaries comes with model turn actress Lily Cole in a lead role. But does it hold the same magic as its contemporaries?
Sixteen year old Rebecca (Sarah Bolger) loves her life at her boarding school, including her friends, especially her BFF Lucy(Sarah Gardon). However when new girl Ernessa (Lily Cole) arrives at the school Lucy grows distant from Rebecca and closer to the mysterious stranger. Rebecca is suspicious of Ernessa but is it just jealousy or is there something supernatural about Ernessa?
I’ve never read the original novel so I can’t say if this is a good adaptation. However what I can say is that it’s a below average movie. It becomes fairly obvious who Ernessa really is, and the film bludgeons you over the head with references to popular literature so even the less genre-savy viewers can guess her secret. The film tries to suggest that Rebecca is perhaps mentally unwell due to her tragic past and obsessiveness over Lucy but it’s pointless considering how unsubtle the movie is about Ernessa. A lackluster ending also disappoints, needing a proper final confrontation to really raise the stakes. Even hints about schoolgirl lesbians doesn’t make it more interesting.
Perhaps whats most disappointing is that the director Mary Harron also made a little film with Christian Bale called American Psycho. Now of course I don’t expect characters to start killing people with an axe while Huey Lewis and The News are playing in the background (although maybe it would help), but I thought she could bring more horror and imagination to the movie.
The acting from the girls isn’t terrible, although Cole suffers from playing such a one-dimensional character. It’s also fairly watchable as long as you don’t expect anything too original. But if you’re looking for a new twist on an old genre movie then you should give this a miss.
Rating 2/5 – it may be easy watching but it’s also easily forgettable
Two years ago today I started this blog! I know it’s difficult to imagine a world where you weren’t being forced my opinions and reviews on the latest movies-those were dark days indeed!
Thanks to everyone who takes the time to read, like, comment and follow this blog. With so many excellent blogs around (look at the Blogs I Follow section for a list of just some of the many excellent blogs I enjoy reading) it’s nice to know that someone out there is reading mine, and I’ve had some lovely conversations with people on this blog.
So go have a piece of cake, a drink or whatever your vice is and celebrate another year of mykindofmovie.
Cheers everyone! 🙂
Based on the bestselling novel by John Green (which I loved) The Fault In Our Stars has exploded into the summer box office making great numbers for a romantic drama. But can it possibly be as good as the book?
Hazel Grace Lancaster (Shailene Woodley) is 16 years old and has terminal cancer. Kept alive by an experiemental drug and dragging round a tank of oxygen with her everywhere she thinks she knows what to expect from her probably short life. Then into her cancer support group comes Augustus Waters (Ansel Elgort), an eighteen year old boy in remission who lost his leg to cancer. As the two bond over Hazel’s favourite book and seek to contact the author, they find themselves slowly falling in love despite Hazel’s terminal situation.
OK from that summary above this film sounds like a overly sentimental affair with all the cliches that you come to expect from these kinds of films. The fact that The Fault In Our Stars avoids most of these tropes makes it special in itself. That fact that you care so much about the characters make it exceptional.
I may be biased becuase I’ve read and loved the book but I loved this film. I was nervous beforehand considering how much I liked the book but this is a faithful adaptation that does justice to John Green’s novel. The two lead characters are wonderful-snarky, funny, intellegent, heartwarming. You feel like you could be friends with these characters. They are played brilliantly by Woodley and Algort. Both roles must have been difficult to cast but Woodley makes for a likeable and sympathetic lead and Algort steers his character away from being the bland romantic lead to give Augustus charisma and believeability even when he’s sprouting his philosphoical musing. We also get to see Gus’s more vunerable side as he worries that one day he’ll fall into oblivion and he will have left the world withoutmaking a mark. Something which Hazel has long resigned herself to before Gus came along. The chemistry between them is fantastic, so much so I can’t imagine them playing brother and sister in Divergent.
Of course there are faults to be had with the movie. Although Grace’s parents are great (played by Laura Dern and Sam Trammell) some of the other supporting characters are either written out or reduced. Augustus’ best friend Issac gets sidelined into more of a comedic role than I remember in the book. Some viewers may also find the scene where Hazel and Gus kiss at the Anne Frank House a bit distasteful although I just saw it as them realising they should seize the moment while they have the chance (the clapping from the other visitors was a bit much though).
I got so into this film that I started crying about halfway through the movie-to my embarassment. I can’t garentee you’ll cry like I did but I think even the hardest of hearts may find themselves falling under the spell of Hazel and Gus.
But I would also recomend you read the book first because it’s so wonderful and adds so much more to their story in the way the film doesn’t have time to.
Rating 4.5/5 – with wonderful performances from Woodley and Algort I can’t fault this adapation of one of my favourite books of recent years